I have a squiggle chart utilizing the SPX and lets review the guidelines for why I have it labeled the way I do:
1. Channeling. It channels fairly nice and wave v stops almost in the middle which is typical.
2. Sharp wave two. Very distinct wave ii in this case. Previous selloffs in the last few weeks lack this characteristic.
3. A breakaway wave iii. In this case the subwaves count nicely in my "virgin wave box" as a third of a third wave.
4. Selling most intense in the suibwave [3] of iii. This too is an ideal situation. Thats why I mentioned the other night that selling had intensified at the close (meaning more selling to come at least for a wave five)
5. Fibonacci expansion ratios. Wave iii expanded a nice 1.78 times wave i. Wave v almost exactly equals wave i making the ratios very ideal.
6. Selling pressure subsided on wave v down versus what was in wave iii and fear (VIX) was lessened. (However sentiment measures should be most extreme at the wave v low which I am sure they were)
7. Wave iv alternation from wave ii. I labeled it an expanded flat particularly since [B] of iv was a three wave move. I also figured the wave iii low was a "thrust" move out of the sub-triangle.
8. Technical divergence (MACD, RSI, etc) on the wave v low and non-confirmations by other indexes.
9. (added) Check out the Fib alignment. 38% at wave iv high, 62% at wave i low.
9. (added) Check out the Fib alignment. 38% at wave iv high, 62% at wave i low.
I'll have more later.

